🤖 Why don't I use the GPT chat to generate another article?

This time, I’d like to share with you my approach to writing articles. As you know - or perhaps don’t - I share with you here my experiences and reflections on software development. The GPT chat is useful for generating supplementary content, like code or certain points I can refer to, but not for generating entire articles - it would be a kind of deceit. Because if I generate an article on, for example, “Js Proxy”, would it be my article? Or an article from the chat that I just agree with? Of course, I could generate an article and adapt it to my needs, but…

What I’m telling you about should be part of my personal experiences and insights that shape me as a developer in some way. I want to talk exclusively about my experiences here, not about points that were generated and perhaps I agree with in part.

I’m not criticizing the chat as I use it and rely on it, but I want what I write to you to be solely of my own authorship. It might be written in poorer language quality, but that’s okay. After all, we all learn, right?

Are the times coming when content not signed by AI will be more valued? I don’t know, though I suspect so.